Vol 23 Publishing After Progress Open Peer Review ofCommitting to decolonial feminist practices of reuseAlberto López CuencaBenemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla Based on your expertise and critical position, what do you…
Vol 23 (2024) Publishing After Progress Guest-Editorial Notes (after Progress?) Rebekka KiesewetterCentre for Postdigital Cultures Coventry University <a href="https://culturemachine.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/CM23_Kiesewetter_Guest_Editorial_Notes.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener"> Pdf </a> <p>Situated at the nexus of the <a…
Vol 23 Publishing After ProgressOpen Peer Review of ‘Reverse Scholarship as Solidarity After Progress‘Jennifer Wolgemuth (reviewer)Roger Magazine & Gabriela Méndez Cota (co-authors) From: Jennifer Wolgemuth Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2024…
Vol 23 Publishing After Progress Experiments Towards Editing Otherwise Rebekka KiesewetterCentre for Postdigital Cultures, Coventry University <a href="https://culturemachine.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/CM23_Kiesewetter_ExperimentsEditing.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener"> Pdf </a>
People who contributed to Vol 23 (2024) Publishing After Progress, guest-edited by Rebekka Kiesewetter
Vol 23 Publishing After Progress Open Peer Review of 'Reverse Scholarship as Solidarity After Progress' Zenia Yébenes Escardó (reviewer) Roger Magazine & Gabriela Méndez Cota (co-authors) Mexico City, 8th…
Vol 23 Publishing After Progress Considering tool economies and design practices within open source publishing (An open peer review of Anja Groten’s ‘Designing Sideways: Inefficient Publishing as a Mode…
Vol 23 Publishing After Progress Open Peer Review of ‘Before Progress. On the Power of Utopian Thinking for Open Access Publishing’ Julien McHardy (reviewer), Toby Steiner (reviewer) & Jefferson Pooley…
Vol 23 Publishing After Progress Open Peer Review ofCommitting to decolonial feminist practices of reuse Priya Rajasekar University of Cambridge The article ‘Committing to decolonial feminist practices of…
The notion of inefficiency is here not used in a derogatory manner. It is proposed as a generative and defiant mode of designing that challenges passive forms of interacting with off-the-shelf commercial software.